Unit-5
Numerical Solution of Algebraic and transcendental equation
This method is consists of finding the root of the equation which lie between a and b (say).
The function is a continuous function between a and b and f (a) and f (b) are of opposite signs then there is a least one root between a and b.
Suppose f (a) is negative and f (b) is positive, then the first approximate value of the root is
If, then the correct root is .But if, then the root either lie between a and or and b according to is positive or negative, we again bisect the interval as above and the process is repeated the root is found to the desired accuracy.
Note: Remember that root of an equation lie between its positive and negative values and we take an average of them to come closer to its accurate root.
Example1 Find a real root of using bisection method correct to five decimal places.
Let then by hit and trial we have
Thus . So the root of the given equation should lie between 1 and 2.
Now,
I.e. positive so the root of the given equation must lie between
Now,
I.e. negative so the root of the given equation lie between
Now,
i.e. positive so the root of the given equation lie between
Now,
i.e. negative so that the root of the given equation lie between
Now,
i.e. positive so that the root of the given equation lie between
Now,
i.e. positive so that the root of the given equation lie between
Now,
I.e. negative so that the root of the given equation lie between
Now,
i.e. negative so that the root of the given equation lie between
Hence the approximate root of the given equation is 1.32421
Example2 Find the root of the equation, using the bisection method.
Let then by hit and trial we have
Thus . So the root of the given equation should lie between 2 and 3.
Now,
i.e. negative so the root of the given equation must lie between
Now,
i.e. positive so the root of the given equation must lie between
Now,
i.e. negative so the root of the given equation must lie between
Now,
i.e. negative so the root of the given equation must lie between
Now,
i.e. positive so the root of the given equation must lie between
Now,
i.e. negative so the root of the given equation must lie between
Hence the root of the given equation correct to two decimal places is 2.67965.
Example3 Find the root of the equation between 2 and 3, using bisection method correct to two decimal places.
Let
Where
Thus . So the root of the given equation should lie between 2 and 3.
Now,
i.e. positive so the root of the given equation must lie between
Now,
i.e. positive so the root of the given equation must lie between
Now,
i.e. negative so the root of the given equation must lie between
Now,
i.e. positive so the root of the given equation must lie between
Now,
i.e. positive so the root of the given equation must lie between
Now,
i.e. positive so the root of the given equation must lie between
Now,
i.e. positive so the root of the given equation must lie between
Now,
i.e. positive so the root of the given equation must lie between
Hence the root of the given equation correct to two decimal places is 2.1269
This method is an improvement over the Regula Falsi Method as it does not require the condition
The general formula for successive approximation is,
Where
We keep on calculating until we get the desired root to the correct decimal places.
Example1 Using the Secant Method find the root of the equation correct to three decimal places
Let
By Secant Method
Let the initial approximation be
For n=1, the first approximation
Now,
For n=2, the second approximation
563839
Now,
For n=3, the third approximation
56717
Now,
For n=4, the fourth approximation
567143
Hence the root of the given equation correct to four decimal places is 0.5671.
Example2 Using the Secant Method to find the root of the equation correct to four decimal places
Let
By Secant Method
Let the initial approximation be
For n=1, the first approximation
Now,
For n=2, the second approximation
Now,
For n=3, the third approximation
Hence the root of the given equation correct to four decimal places is 3.25636
Example3 Using the Secant Method find the root of the equation correct to four decimal place
Let
By Secant Method
Let the initial approximation be
For n=1, the first approximation
Now,
So the root of the equation lies between 2 and 1.92857
For n=2, the second approximation,
Now,
So the root of the equation lie between 2 and 1.96590
For n=3, the third approximation
Now,
So the root of the equation lie between 2 and 1.96600
For n=4, the fourth approximation
Now,
So the root of the equation lie between 2 and 1.96687
For n=5, the fifth approximation
Now,
So the root of the equation lie between 2 and 1.96690
For n=6, the sixth approximation
Now,
Hence the root of the given equation correct to four decimal places is 1.9669.
This is the oldest method of finding the approximate numerical value of a real root of an equation.
In this method, we suppose that and are two points where and are of opposite sign. Let
Hence the root of the equation lie between and and so,
The Regula Falsi formula
Find is positive or negative. If then root lie between and or if then root lies between and similarly, we calculate
Proceed in this manner until the desired accurate root is found.
Example1 Find a real root of the equation near, correct to three decimal places by the Regula Falsi method.
Let
Now,
And also
Hence the root of the equation lie between and and so,
By Regula Falsi Method
Now,
So the root of the equation lie between 1 and 0.5 and so
By Regula Falsi Method
Now,
So the root of the equation lie between 1 and 0.63637 and so
By Regula Falsi Method
Now,
So the root of the equation lie between 1 and 0.67112 and so
By Regula Falsi Method
Now,
So the root of the equation lie between 1 and 0.63636 and so
By Regula Falsi Method
Now,
So the root of the equation lie between 1 and 0.68168 and so
By Regula Falsi Method
Now,
Hence the approximate root of the given equation near 1 is 0.68217
Example2 Find the real root of the equation
By the method of false position correct to four decimal places
Let
By hit and trail method
0.23136 > 0
So, the root of the equation lie between 2 and 3 and also
By Regula Falsi Method
Now,
So, the root of the equation lies between 2.72101 and 3 and also
By Regula Falsi Method
Now,
So, the root of the equation lies between 2.74020 and 3 and also
By Regula Falsi Method
Now,
So, the root of the equation lies between 2.74063 and 3 and also
By Regula Falsi Method
Hence the root of the given equation correct to four decimal places is 2.7406
Example3 Apply Regula Falsi Method to solve the equation
Let
By hit and trail
And
So the root of the equation lie between and also
By Regula Falsi Method
Now,
So, the root of the equation lies between 0.60709 and 0.61 and also
By Regula Falsi Method
Now,
So, the root of the equation lies between 0.60710 and 0.61 and also
By Regula Falsi Method
Hence the root of the given equation correct to five decimal places is 0.60710.
Let be the approximate root of the equation.
By Newton Raphson formula
In general,
Where n=1, 2, 3…… we keep on calculating until we get the desired root to the correct decimal places.
Example1 Using the Newton-Raphson method, find a root of the following equation correct to 3 decimal places:.
Given
By Newton- Raphson Method
=
=
The initial approximation is in radian.
For n =0, the first approximation
For n =1, the second approximation
For n =2, the third approximation
For n =3, the fourth approximation
Hence the root of the given equation correct to five decimal places 2.79838.
Example2 Using the Newton-Raphson method, find a root of the following equation correct to 3 decimal places: near to 4.5
Let
The initial approximation
By Newton Raphson Method
For n =0, the first approximation
For n =1, the second approximation
For n =2, the third approximation
For n =3, the fourth approximation
Hence the root of the equation correct to three decimal places is 4.5579
Example3 Using the Newton-Raphson method, find a root of the following equation correct to 4 decimal places:
Let
By Newton Raphson Method
Let the initial approximation be
For n=0, the first approximation
For n=1, the second approximation
For n=2, the third approximation
Since therefore the root of the given equation correct to four decimal places is -2.9537
Successive Approximation Method:
The successive approximation is also known as the iteration method. To start the solution using this method we need one or more approximate values which is not necessarily the root of the given equation.
We are finding the root of the given equation
..(1)
We rewrite the given equation in the form
..(2)
We know that the root of the equation lie between its positive and the negative values
Let
So, the interval of the root of the equation be .
Now, let be an approximate root of the given equation (1).
Putting it in equation (2) we get
Successive substitution give the approximations
…………..
If the above values converge to a definite number then that number will be the root of the given equation.
Example1: Find the real root of the equation
Correct to three decimal places in the interval ]
The given equation is ..(1)
Or
Or = ..(2)
Or
Let , in the interval .
The successive approximation we have
Hence the root of the equation correct to three decimal places is 1.524.
Example2: Find the real root of the polynomial correct to three decimal places?
Given equation ….(1)
Here
Also
Therefore the root of the equation lies between .
Again
….(2)
Let , in the interval .
The successive approximation we have
Hence the root of the equation correct to three decimal places is 0.755.
Example3: By iteration method, find the value of , correct to three decimal places.
Let
Let .
Also
Therefore the root of the equation lie between 3 and 4.
Given equation can rewrite .
Or …(2)
Let , in the interval .
The successive approximation we have
Hence the root of the equation correct to three decimal places is 3.634.
Convergence and stability-
Convergence-
A sequence of iterates is said to converge with order if
For some constant c > 0.
Note-
Stability-
Let there are n steps to evaluate a function. Then the total process of evaluating this function is said to have instability if at least one step is ill-conditioned. If all the steps are well-conditioned, then the process is said to be stable.
In this method, we eliminate successively the unknown so that the equation (1) remain with the single unknown and reduce to the upper triangular system. At last with help of back substitution, we calculate the values of the remaining unknowns.
Consider a system of n linear equation in n unknown
… …… ….. … (1)
… …… …. …
To convert the above system into an upper triangular matrix we eliminate from the second, third, fourth …., n equations above by multiplying the first equation by added them to the corresponding equations second, third, fourth,…., n equation. We get
… …… ….. …
… …… …. …
Repeating the above method for we get finally the upper triangular form.
Upper Triangular form of above
……………………….. (i)
Thus .
Then we calculate the values of .
Example1 Apply Gauss Elimination method to solve the equations:
Given Check Sum (sum of coefficient and constant)
-1 …. (I)
-16 …. (ii)
5 …. (iii)
(I)We eliminate x from (ii) and (iii)
Apply eq(ii)-eq(i) and eq(iii)-3eq(i) we get
-1 ….(i)
-15 ….(iv)
8 ….(v)
(II) We eliminate y from eq(v)
Apply
-1 ….(i)
-15 ….(iv)
73 ….(vi)
(III) Back Substitution we get
From (vi) we get
From (iv) we get
From (i) we get
Hence the solution of the given equation is
Example2 Solve the equation by Gauss Elimination Method:
Given
Rewrite the given equation as
… (i)
….(ii)
….(iii)
…(iv)
(I) We eliminate x from (ii),(iii) and (iv) we get
Apply eq(ii) + 6eq(i), eq(iii) -3eq(i), eq(iv)-5eq(i) we get
…(i)
….(v)
….(vi)
…(vii)
(II) We eliminate y from (vi) and (vii) we get
Apply 3.8 eq(vi)-3.1eq(v) and 3.8eq(vii)+5.5eq(v) we get
…(i)
….(v)
…(viii)
…(ix)
(III) We eliminate z from eq (ix) we get
Apply 9.3eq (ix) + 8.3eq (viii), we get
… (i)
….(v)
…(viii)
350.74u=350.74
Or u = 1
(IV) Back Substitution
From eq(viii)
Form eq(v), we get
From eq(i) ,
Hence the solution of the given equation is x=5, y=4, z=-7 and u=1.
Example3
Apply Gauss Elimination Method to solve the following system of the equation:
Given … (i)
… (ii)
… (iii)
(I) We eliminate x from (ii) and (iii)
Apply we get
… (i)
… (iv)
… (v)
(II) We eliminate y from (v)
Apply we get
… (i)
… (vi)
… (vii)
(III) Back substitution
From (vii)
From (vi)
From (i)
Hence the solution of the equation is
The method is based on the fact that every matrix A can be expressed as the product of a lower triangular matrix and an upper triangular matrix, provided all the principal minors of A are non-singular.
Which means-
If , then-
Now consider the equations-
We can write it as-
Where-
Let
Where-
Equation (1) becomes-
Writing-
Equation (3) becomes-
which is equivalent to the equations-
Solving these for we know V. Then equation (4) becomes-
From which can be found by back substitution.
We write (2) as to find the matrix L and U-
Multiplying the matrix on the left and equating corresponding elements from both sides, we get-
3.
4.
5.
We compute the elements of L and U in the following manner-
Example: Solve the equations-
Sol.
Let
So that-
3.
4.
5.
So
Thus-
Writing UX = V,
The system of given equations become-
By solving this-
We get-
Therefore the given system becomes-
Which means-
By back substitution, we have-
Jacobi’s Iteration method:
Let us consider the system of simultaneous linear equation
(1)
The coefficients of the diagonal elements are larger than all other coefficients and are non-zero. Rewrite the above equation we get
(2)
Take the initial approximation we get the values of the first approximation of .
By the successive iteration, we will get the desired result.
Example1 Use Jacobi’s method to solve the system of equations:
Since
So, we express the unknown with a large coefficient in terms of other coefficients.
(1)
Let the initial approximation be
2.35606
0.91666
1.932936
0.831912
3.016873
1.969654
3.010217
1.986010
1.988631
0.915055
1.986532
0.911609
1.985792
0.911547
1.98576
0.911698
Since the approximation in the ninth and tenth iteration is the same up to three decimal places, hence the solution of the given equations is
Example2 Solve by Jacobi’s Method, the equations
Given equation can be rewritten in the form
… (i)
..(ii)
..(iii)
Let the initial approximation be
Putting these values on the right of the equation (i), (ii), and (iii) and so we get
Putting these values on the right of the equation (i), (ii), and (iii) and so we get
Putting these values on the right of the equation (i), (ii), and (iii) and so we get
0.90025
Putting these values on the right of the equation (i), (ii), and (iii) and so we get
Putting these values on the right of the equation (i), (ii), and (iii) and so we get
Hence solution approximately is
Example3Use Jacobi’s method to solve the system of the equations
Rewrite the given equations
(1)
Let the initial approximation be
1.2
1.3
0.9
1.03
0.9946
0.9934
1.0015
Hence the solution of the above equation correct to two decimal places is
Gauss-Seidel method:
This is the modification of Jacobi’s Iteration. As above in Jacobi’s Iteration, we take first approximation as and put in the right-hand side of the first equation of (2) and let the result be . Now we put right-hand side of the second equation of (2) and suppose the result is now put in the RHS of the third equation of (2) and suppose the result be the above method is repeated till the values of all the unknown are found up to the desired accuracy.
Example1 Use the Gauss-Seidel Iteration method to solve the system of equations
Since
So, we express the unknown of larger coefficients in terms of the unknowns with smaller coefficients.
Rewrite the above system of equations
(1)
Let the initial approximation be
3.14814
2.43217
2.42571
2.4260
Hence the solution correct to three decimal places is
Example2 Solve the following system of equations
By Gauss-Seidel method.
Rewrite the given system of equations as
(1)
Let the initial approximation be
Thus the required solution is
Example3 Solve the following equations by Gauss-Seidel Method
Rewrite the above system of equations
(1)
Let the initial approximation be
Hence the required solution is
References
1. Erwin Kreyszig, Advanced Engineering Mathematics, 9thEdition, John Wiley & Sons, 2006.
2. N.P. Bali and Manish Goyal, A textbook of Engineering Mathematics, Laxmi Publications.
3. Higher engineering mathematic, Dr. B.S. Grewal, Khanna publishers