Back to Study material
AFM 3


UNIT II


Piecemeal Distribution of Cash

Question Bank

Part A

Q1) Describe the order in which outside liabilities are paid under piecemeal distribution. (5 marks)

A1) In the dissolution issue, we found that the assets were realized, the liabilities were paid, the realization of the losses was transferred to the partner's capital account, and finally the capital balance was paid. We assume that all assets will be realized on the day of dissolution and the liabilities will be repaid on the same day, so there will be no cash distribution issues. This assumption allows you to quickly see the realized gains or losses that are transferred to your partner's capital account and the final balances they result. All assets are transferred in one day, so you can pay all your liabilities and your partner's capital account balances at once.

However, in reality, this is unrealistic. Not all assets can be realized on the day of dissolution. In reality, there is a time interval of several months before the two assets are realized, and the entire dissolution process can take a very long time. Assets are gradually realized little by little. Therefore, it is not possible to pay off all debt at once and pay the membership fee from the company to the partner. The question arises here-how do you distribute cash between different parties and to whom is the first payment made?

Meaning:

In reality, assets are not realized all at once in a day unless the business is sold to someone. Partners expect a fair price for their assets, so we will gradually do so depending on market conditions. Therefore, the entire implementation process is time consuming. That means months, sometimes a year, or even more. The process that follows to fulfill a partner's liabilities and claims when the asset is realized is called a fragmentary distribution of cash.

Q2) Describe how piecemeal distribution is more realistic than normal dissolution of firm. (8 marks)

A2) So far, we have assumed that all assets will be realized immediately on the day of dissolution. All partner and creditor accounts will be settled on the same day.

However, this assumption is inherently impractical because the process of realizing an asset usually takes a long time and cash is distributed at the time of realization. In such cases, to avoid unpleasant consequences, the realized assets are distributed so that the outstanding balance of each partner's capital remains in the profit-sharing ratio.

When the asset is realized in stages, the cash is distributed in the following order:

  1. The company's debt to a third party (external debt) must be paid first.
  2. 2. After the creditor has been repaid, you need to pay the amount you should pay to your partner as a loan. If the loan is from multiple partners, the available cash should be distributed proportionally.
  3. 3. After paying the external debt and loan payable to the partner, the partner's capital will be paid.

Payment order:

The available cash and the cash collected at the time of realization of the asset must be distributed in the following order:

1. First, pay the realization cost. If you don't know the actual cost, you need to keep the estimated amount individually to meet the actual cost when it occurs. If there is a surplus, it should be made available to other creditors.

2. Second, a secured creditor who makes a specific claim against a particular asset or is secured by a variable claim against all assets.

A bank loan for a land and building mortgage or bank overdraft secured by a variable fee for the entire asset is an example of a fully secured creditor.

3. Next, unsecured creditors such as creditors, bills payable, balances, etc. are dissatisfied with partially secured creditors, loans or overdrafts, without specific or general charges and unpaid costs. It remains. These are paid proportionally, that is, in a proportional distribution.

4. Next, if there are multiple partner loans and prepayments, the payment will be made on a prorated basis.

5. Finally, payment to the partner for capital contributions / claims in such a way that the balance (loss or profit) is the profit-sharing ratio.

Repayment of capital:

Once the assets have been realized in pieces and all the liabilities have been paid off, the question is how to distribute cash between partners for the repayment of capital. One way is to wait until all the assets are realized. After all assets are realized, the loss or profit from the realization is known, which is transferred to the capital account and the final balance is repaid. This is not possible with the capital account and the final balance will be repaid. This is neither possible nor practical, as partners are not ready to wait indefinitely for the final realization of the asset. In these situations, there is a gradual, gradual, or intermediate cash distribution between partners. The gradual distribution of cash to partners raises the question of who and at what rate the first available cash will be paid. With fragmented distribution, the final loss of realization is a high profit-sharing rate and there is no overpayment to partners.

If the capital is in the profit-sharing ratio, the cash will be distributed in the profit-sharing ratio and the final deficit will be in the same ratio. However, if the capital is not in the profit-sharing ratio, the remaining final balance (realized loss) is not included in the profit-sharing ratio and the available cash cannot be distributed in the profit-sharing ratio. At the same time, it cannot be distributed by capital ratio. In that case, the partner must bear the final loss of the capital ratio, which is different from the profit-sharing ratio of the capital. It is different from the profit-sharing rate. Therefore, it is necessary to change the cash distribution method so that the unpaid amount will eventually become the profit-sharing ratio.

Q3) How is surplus capital calculated under piecemeal distribution? (8 marks)

A3) This method is also known as Surplus Capital Law, Supreme Relative Capital Law, Excess Capital Law or Commercial Code. If the partner's capital is in the ratio of the profit-sharing arrangement and then each is paid according to the capital adequacy ratio in each distribution. If the partner's capital is not in the profit-sharing ratio, the first cash available for distribution between partners (after payment of external liabilities and loans to the partner) must be paid to the partner whose capital exceeds the profit. Distribution ratio to bring capital to profit sharing level. After this, the available cash will be distributed to all partners according to the profit-sharing ratio.

The outstanding balance of the capital account represents the loss at realization, which is exactly the profit-sharing ratio.

In other words, the basic estimate of this method is that partners who contribute more than proportional capital should be paid first in the range of excess capital beyond proportional capital. Next steps to follow when deciding who and how much to pay:

  1. Calculate the actual capital of all partners (after adjusting cumulative profit / reserve / loss, transferring checking balance, etc.).
  2. Divide each partner's actual capital by the profit share and treat the smallest quotient as basic capital.
  3. Multiply the basic capital by the profit share to calculate the proportional capital.
  4. Calculate surplus capital by subtracting proportional capital (according to step 3 (according to step 1) from actual capital)
  5. If only one partner has surplus capital, pay that partner first. If there are multiple partners and their surplus capital is in the profit-sharing ratio, cash will be distributed among such partners at that surplus capital ratio until the surplus capital is repaid. Or If the partner's surplus capital is not in the profit-sharing ratio, proceed to step # 6.
  6. Divide the surplus capital by the profit-sharing ratio (according to step 4) and treat the smallest quotient as the revised base capital.
  7. Multiply the revised base capital (as in step 6) by the profit share to calculate the revised proportional capital.
  8. Calculate the adjusted surplus capital by subtracting the modified proportional capital (according to step 7) from the surplus capital (according to step 6).
  9. Proceed to step 5. That is, repeat this process until the number of partners is reduced to one.

Classification of debt

Liability, including the amount payable to a partner, can fall into three major categories. External responsibility, that is, membership fees for outsiders. Internal liability, ie partner loan; and partner's capital account.

External liabilities may be further subdivided into “preferred liabilities” and “other liabilities”. Preferred debt includes i) government membership fees such as income tax and property tax. Ii) Unpaid wages, membership fees for employees such as reserve funds, and

Iii) Realization cost. Other liabilities are either i) secured liabilities or ii) unsecured liabilities.

Provisions of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932:

Section 48 of the Indian Partnership Act of 1932 provides that the following rules shall be complied with, subject to agreement, in the settlement of accounts between partners after the dissolution of the partnership.

Gradual distribution of cash

i) Losses, including capital shortages, shall be adjusted individually, first from undivided profits, then from capital, and finally, if necessary, at the rate at which the partners are entitled to share profits. I will.

Ii) Company assets, including totals, provided by a partner to make up for a loss or deficiency of capital shall be applied in the following manner and order.

  1. Payment to external creditors.
  2. Repayment of advance payments made by a partner (unlike capital investment).
  3. Repayment of capital to partners. And
  4. If there is a final residual, the profit shall be split among the partners in a splitable ratio.

Therefore, the Partnership Law stipulates that the debit balance of capital or checking account should be adjusted first from undistributed profits before disposing of the business. Then, when the asset is realized, it first repays the external creditor, then the partner's loan, and then the partner's capital balance. There is no mention of the cost of realizing the law. But without it you can't dispose of your assets, so you need to prepare for the same first. If you need to advertise in the newspaper to dispose of your property, no one can know about such disposition without spending money on advertising.

Cash distribution between partners:

As mentioned above, after the settlement of external and internal liabilities, the cash obtained from the realization of the asset should be distributed between the partners to settle the equity balance. Again, you need to determine the order and percentage of payments to your partners in your capital account. Should cash be distributed in proportion to the partner's capital? The distribution must be made so that the unpaid amount after distribution of all realizations is the profit-sharing ratio. The balance outstanding in the capital account is the realized loss, which must be the profit-sharing ratio.

Partners share profits and losses in a particular ratio, the profit-sharing ratio. The exact amount of profit or loss from realization will not be known until all assets have been disposed of. The partner may not have capital in the profit share.

The problem arises when the partner's capital balance is not in the partner's ratio.

Share profits and losses. In such cases, the available cash cannot be distributed between partners in a profit-sharing ratio. This is because the unpaid amount, or loss, is not included in the profit-sharing ratio. See the example below. Revenue cannot be distributed by capital adequacy ratio. Then, the unpaid balance, that is, the loss, becomes the capital ratio, but it becomes the profit-sharing ratio.

Q4) Under what circumstances are the outside liabilities paid on a pro-rata basis? (5 marks)

A4) Once the assets have been realized in pieces and all the liabilities have been paid off, the question is how to distribute cash between partners for the repayment of capital. One way is to wait until all the assets are realized. After all assets are realized, the loss or profit from the realization is known, which is transferred to the capital account and the final balance is repaid. This is not possible with the capital account and the final balance will be repaid. This is neither possible nor practical, as partners are not ready to wait indefinitely for the final realization of the asset. In these situations, there is a gradual, gradual, or intermediate cash distribution between partners. The gradual distribution of cash to partners raises the question of who and at what rate the first available cash will be paid. With fragmented distribution, the final loss of realization is a high profit-sharing rate and there is no overpayment to partners.

If the capital is in the profit-sharing ratio, the cash will be distributed in the profit-sharing ratio and the final deficit will be in the same ratio. However, if the capital is not in the profit-sharing ratio, the remaining final balance (realized loss) is not included in the profit-sharing ratio and the available cash cannot be distributed in the profit-sharing ratio. At the same time, it cannot be distributed by capital ratio. In that case, the partner must bear the final loss of the capital ratio, which is different from the profit-sharing ratio of the capital. It is different from the profit-sharing rate. Therefore, it is necessary to change the cash distribution method so that the unpaid amount will eventually become the profit-sharing ratio.

If the assets are realized little by little, you need to follow the proper order to repay the liabilities. Of the scale revenue, the dissolution cost must be met first and the rest must be used to pay external creditors (bank O / D, B / P, creditors, loans, etc.) in the following order:

(1) Payment to a fully secured creditor.

(2) Payment to partially secured creditors within the realization of securities.

(3) Payment to priority creditors (salary, membership fee to the government).

(4) Payment to unsecured creditors.

(5) Internal liabilities must be paid in the form of a partner loan only after the unsecured external creditor has been fully repaid.

(6) Finally, the partner must pay a membership fee for the capital.

If creditors are indistinguishable in the above categories, payments must be "proportional zed" based on unpaid claims when the asset is realized.

Q5) What does the surplus method mean? (8 marks)

A5) You must adjust your partner's capital to a profit-sharing ratio and pay your partner an excess contribution first when cash is realized. This process should be repeated until the capital is proportional to the share of profits. Once a partner's excess contribution has been paid (capital adjusted to PSR), the cash realization may be distributed to all partners within the capital PSR.

This method is called the surplus / excess method because excess capital contributions are calculated in comparison to PSR and paid in advance. This is called the proportional capital / index method because capital must be purchased in proportion to the PSR.

Q6) What is the basis for the distribution of cash to a partner's capital in a gradual distribution of cash? (5 marks)

A6) As long as the union member's capital contribution rate and profit-sharing rate are the same, there is no problem with cash distribution at the time of realization if the distribution is proportionally distributed according to the claim. However, if these two ratios are different, the proportional distribution of cash according to their claim causes problems. If the available cash is distributed at the equity ratio, any loss or gain on dissolution shared by the partner may not be included in the profit-sharing ratio. Conversely, if the available cash is distributed in a profit-sharing ratio, one or two partners may get more than what is attributed to them.

What is the distribution method in the scheme that follows to distribute cash when realized in pieces?

These are ways to distribute cash in small increments.

1. Surplus / excess / proportional / commercial capital method.

2. Maximum possible / assumed loss method.

Surplus Method

You must adjust your partner's capital to a profit-sharing ratio and pay your partner an excess contribution first when cash is realized. This process should be repeated until the capital is proportional to the share of profits. Once a partner's excess contribution has been paid (capital adjusted to PSR), the cash realization may be distributed to all partners within the capital PSR.

This method is called the surplus / excess method because excess capital contributions are calculated in comparison to PSR and paid in advance. This is called the proportional capital / index method because capital must be purchased in proportion to the PSR.

Maximum Loss Method

The maximum loss method is an improved way to distribute cash at realization. Here, it is assumed that at every stage of the cash distribution realized, there will be no further realization and the company will suffer the greatest loss. Therefore, the hypothetical loss is distributed to the partner at a profit-sharing rate before the partner's claim is paid. The assumption that it will not be realized anymore results in the conceptual loss caused at this stage of realization.

Do you specify the order of debt forgiveness in the gradual distribution of cash?

When assets are realized little by little, you need to follow the proper order to fulfill your liabilities. Of the revenue of scale, the cost of dissolution must be met first and the balance must be used to pay external creditors (banks O / D, B / P, creditors, loans, etc.) in the following order:

(1) Fully secured creditor payments.

(2) Payment to partially secured creditors within the realization of securities.

(3) Payment to priority creditors (salary, membership fee to the government).

(4) Payment to unsecured creditors.

(5) Internal liabilities must be paid in the form of a partner loan only after the unsecured external creditor has been completely canceled.

(6) Finally, the partner must pay a membership fee for the capital.

If the creditors cannot be distinguished in the above categories, the payment must be made in a "proportional distribution" based on the unpaid claims at the time the asset was realized.

Q7) Write note on Maximum Loss Method. (5 mark)

A7) An alternative method of split distribution between partners is to calculate the maximum loss possible for all realizations after the external debt and the partner's loan have been paid. The amount distributable between partners is compared to the total amount of capital paid to the partners and the maximum loss is determined on the assumption that no amount will be realized in future assets. The maximum fixed loss is deducted from the partner's capital balance at each profit and loss share, and the balance remaining in the capital account after deducting the maximum loss is the amount to be paid to the partner.

If a partner's share of the maximum possible loss exceeds the amount credited to the capital account, he will be treated as insolvent and the shortfall will be debited to the insolvent partner's capital account as a percentage of that capital. Will be the Murray Rule on the dissolution date stated under Garner v / s. After deducting the share of maximum loss and the share of the insolvent partner's shortfall, the creditable amount of the partner is equal to the cash available for distribution between partners.

This maximum loss process repeats each realization until all assets are disposed of.

Q8) Write short note on Payment order. (5 marks)

A8) The available cash and the cash collected at the time of realization of the asset must be distributed in the following order:

1. First, pay the realization cost. If you don't know the actual cost, you need to keep the estimated amount individually to meet the actual cost when it occurs. If there is a surplus, it should be made available to other creditors.

2. Second, a secured creditor who makes a specific claim against a particular asset or is secured by a variable claim against all assets.

A bank loan for a land and building mortgage or bank overdraft secured by a variable fee for the entire asset is an example of a fully secured creditor.

3. Next, unsecured creditors such as creditors, bills payable, balances, etc. are dissatisfied with partially secured creditors, loans or overdrafts, without specific or general charges and unpaid costs. It remains. These are paid proportionally, that is, in a proportional distribution.

4. Next, if there are multiple partner loans and prepayments, the payment will be made on a prorated basis.

5. Finally, payment to the partner for capital contributions / claims in such a way that the balance (loss or profit) is the profit-sharing ratio.

Q9) Define Repayment of capital. (5 marks)

A9) Once the assets have been realized in pieces and all the liabilities have been paid off, the question is how to distribute cash between partners for the repayment of capital. One way is to wait until all the assets are realized. After all assets are realized, the loss or profit from the realization is known, which is transferred to the capital account and the final balance is repaid. This is not possible with the capital account and the final balance will be repaid. This is neither possible nor practical, as partners are not ready to wait indefinitely for the final realization of the asset. In these situations, there is a gradual, gradual, or intermediate cash distribution between partners. The gradual distribution of cash to partners raises the question of who and at what rate the first available cash will be paid. With fragmented distribution, the final loss of realization is a high profit-sharing rate and there is no overpayment to partners.

If the capital is in the profit-sharing ratio, the cash will be distributed in the profit-sharing ratio and the final deficit will be in the same ratio. However, if the capital is not in the profit-sharing ratio, the remaining final balance (realized loss) is not included in the profit-sharing ratio and the available cash cannot be distributed in the profit-sharing ratio. At the same time, it cannot be distributed by capital ratio. In that case, the partner must bear the final loss of the capital ratio, which is different from the profit-sharing ratio of the capital. It is different from the profit-sharing rate. Therefore, it is necessary to change the cash distribution method so that the unpaid amount will eventually become the profit-sharing ratio. There are two ways to distribute cash in the right way capital method or proportional capital method:

  1. Surplus method or Proportionate Capital Method.
  2. Maximum loss method or assumed loss method.

Q10) How is cash distributed between partners? (5 marks)

A10) As mentioned above, after the settlement of external and internal liabilities, the cash obtained from the realization of the asset should be distributed between the partners to settle the equity balance. Again, you need to determine the order and percentage of payments to your partners in your capital account. Should cash be distributed in proportion to the partner's capital? The distribution must be made so that the unpaid amount after distribution of all realizations is the profit-sharing ratio. The balance outstanding in the capital account is the realized loss, which must be the profit-sharing ratio.

Partners share profits and losses in a particular ratio, the profit-sharing ratio. The exact amount of profit or loss from realization will not be known until all assets have been disposed of. The partner may not have capital in the profit share.

The problem arises when the partner's capital balance is not in the partner's ratio.

Share profits and losses. In such cases, the available cash cannot be distributed between partners in a profit-sharing ratio. This is because the unpaid amount, or loss, is not included in the profit-sharing ratio. See the example below. Revenue cannot be distributed by capital adequacy ratio. Then, the unpaid balance, that is, the loss, becomes the capital ratio, but it becomes the profit-sharing ratio.

Part B

Q11) A, B, C are partners with capital Rs.20,000, Rs.10,000, Rs.5,000. The profit-sharing ratios of A, B and C are 2: 2: 1 respectively. Calculate surplus capital.(8  marks)

A1)                                     Statement showing Surplus Capital

A

B

C

Profit Sharing Ratio

3

2

1

Actual Capital

Dividing the capital of each partner by the respective share,

So minimum capital is contributed by C. Hence, taking capitals of partners on the basis C’s Capital (C is having the least capital)

75,000

25,000

45,000

22,500

15,000

15,000

45,000

30,000

15,000

Surplus Capital

30,000

15,000

Nil

Now, in between A &B taking B’s Capitals as base A’s surplus should be

22,500

15,000

Absolute Ultimate Surplus

7,500

Nil

Q12) A, B, and C share corporate profits in proportions of ½, ¼, and ¼, respectively. They decided to dissolve the company on March 31, 2019, when the balance sheet was as follows(8 marks)

Balance sheet

Liabilities

Rs.

Assets

Rs.

Capital Accounts:

Plant and Machinery

25,000

A 18000

Stock

15,000

B 15000

Furniture &Fittings

8,000

C 13000

46,000

Debtors

22,000

Investments

10,000

General Reserve Creditors

4,000

30,000

80,000

80,000

The assets were gradually realized as follows.

  1. First realization: Rs.28,000

Second realization: Rs.14,000

Third realization: Rs.26,000

2.  Shows how revenue is distributed when received under the surplus capital method.

A2)

Particulars

A

B

C

Capital Balances

Add General Reserve (2:1:1) Final Capitals

Profit Sharing Ratio

18,000

2,000

15,000

1,000

13,000

1,000

20,000

2

16,000

1

14,000

1

Per Unit Capital

As A’s Capital is lowest, it will be taken as base capital by multiplying with their profit-sharing ratio.

10,000

20,000

16,000

10,000

14,000

10,000

Surplus Capital Profit Sharing Ratio

-----

6,000

1

4,000

1

Statement Showing Surplus Capital

Per Unit Capital

-----

6,000

4,000

As C’s Capital is lowest, it will be taken as base capital

By multiplying with their profit-sharing ratio

-----

4,000

4,000

Surplus Capital

2,000

-----

Particulars

Cash

Creditors

A

B

C

Balances as per Balance sheet Add: General Reserve in the Profit-Sharing Ratio 2:1:1

30,000

18,000

2,000

15,000

1,000

13,000

1,000

30,000

20,000

16,000

14,000

First Instalment

(- ) Paid to Creditors

28,000

28,000

28,000

----

----

-----

Second Instalment

(- ) Paid to Creditors

----- 14,000

2,000

2,000

2,000

20,000

-----

16,000

----

14,000

----

(- ) Paid to B

12,000

2,000

-----

20,000

----

16,000

2,000

14,000

----

10,000

20,000

14,000

14,000

(- ) Paid to B & C in their Profit Sharing Ratio

8,000

----

4,000

4,000

(- ) Paid to all in their profit sharing ratio

2,000

2,000

20,000

1,000

10,000

500

10,000

500

Third Instalment

(- ) Paid to all in their profit sharing ratio

---- 26,000

26,000

19,000

13,000

9,500

6,500

9,500

6,500

Realization Loss

----

6,000

3,000

3,000

Statement Showing Piecemeal Distribution of Cash as per Surplus Capital Method

Order of Payment:

1.Creditors -Rs.30,000

2. B -Rs.2,000

3. B & C -Rs.8,000 (Rs.4,000 each)

Q13) 2. X, Y and Z continued to operate as partners sharing profits and losses in a 2: 2: 1 ratio, respectively. Their balance sheet is as follows:

Balance sheet as on 31st March, 2019

Liabilities

Rs.

Assets

Rs.

Sundry Creditors

30,000

Cash in hand

12,000

Capital Accounts:

Sundry Debtors

20,000

X 56,000

Plant &Machinery

24,000

Y 50,000

Land &Building

1,00,000

Z 20,000

1,26,000

1,56,000

1,56,000

Their partnership has been broken and the amount has been realized as follows:

First installation: Rs.16,000

Second installation: Rs.28,000

Third installation: Rs.32,000

Realization cost reached Rs.2,000

Performance

a. Statement showing surplus capital

b. Statement showing cash distribution (12marks)

A3)

Statement showing surplus Capital

Particulars

X

Y

Z

Capital Balances

56,000

50,000

20,000

Profit Sharing Ratio

2

2

1

Per Unit Capital

23,000

25,000

20,000

As Z’s Capital is the lowest

Capital it will be taken as

40,000

40,000

20,000

The base capital by

Multiplying with their

Profit sharing ratio

Surplus Capital

16,000

10,000

-----

Profit Sharing Ratio

2

2

Per Unit Capital

8,000

5,000

As Y’s Capital is the lowest

Capital it will be taken as

The base capital by

Multiplying with their profit sharing ratio

10,000

10,000

6,000

----

Order of Payment:

  1. Realization Expenses
  2. Sundry Creditors

XRs.6,000

4. X and Y -Rs.20,000 (Rs.10,000 each)

Statement Showing Piecemeal Distribution of Cash

Particulars

Cash

Sundry Creditors

X

Y

Z

Balances as per

12,000

30,000

56,000

50,000

20,000

Balance sheet

( - ) paid for

Realization

Expenses

2,000

( - ) paid to

10,000

30,000

56,000

50,000

20,000

Sundry creditors

10,000

10,000

---

----

-----

First Instalment

----

20,000

56,000

50,000

20,000

( - ) paid to sundry creditors

16,000

16,000

16,000

----

----

------

-----

4,000

56,000

50,000

20,000

Second

28,000

Instalment

( - ) paid to sundry creditors

4,000

4,000

-----

-----

------

( -) paid to X

24,000

6,000

-----

56,000

6,000

50,000

----

20,000

-----

( - ) paid to X &

18,000

50,000

50,000

20,000

Y

18,000

9,000

9,000

----

-----

41,000

41,000

20,000

Third

32,000

Instalment

( - ) paid to X&

Y

2,000

1,000

1,000

-----

( - ) paid to all in

Their profit

30,000

40,000

40,000

20,000

Sharing ratio

30,000

12,000

12,000

6,000

Realization Loss

-----

28,000

28,000

14,000

Q14) The Py Ra Mides company presents the following balance sheet prepared on March 31, 2014.

Liabilities

Rs

Assets

Rs

Sundry Creditors

74,000

Cash in hand Sundry Debtors Stock in trade Machinery Current Accounts:

R

M

8,000

  6,000

6,000

Capital Accounts:

68,000

P

80,000

78,000

R

60,000

1,02,000

M

54,000

1,94,000

14,000

2,68,000

2,68,000

Partners shared profit and loss in a 4: 3: 3 ratios. Due to the differences between partners, we firmly realize assets and cash distribution between partners at the end of each month.

(I) April 2014 – Rs30,000 from the debtor and Rs 40,000 due to the sale of shares. Realization cost Rs1,000.

(II) May 2014 – The debtor's balance reached Rs 20,000. Balance of acquired inventory

Rs48,000.

(III) June 2014 – Some of the machines sold for Rs 36,000. Costs associated with the sale Rs1,200.

(Iv) July 2014 – Some of the machines rated "10,000" in the book were acquired by P and some were discharged at the agreed value of "20,000". The machine's balance was sold for Rs 60,000 (net).

Partners have decided to maintain a minimum cash balance of Rs 4,000 for the first two months and Rs 2,000 thereafter. Shows how the amount payable to the partner is settled according to the highest relative capital.(12 marks)

A4)               In the books of Py Ra Mides                 Statement of Excess Capital

Particulars

P (4)

R (3)

M (3)

Capital

80,000

60,000

54,000

Less: Current A/c

8,000

6,000

Adjusted Capitals

80,000

52,000

48,000

M’s Capital being lowest taken as base (Note 1)

64,000

48,000

48,000

Excess Capital

16,000

4,000

NIL

R’s Capital being lowest taken as base (Note 2)

5,333

4,000

Ultimate Excess Capital

10,667

NIL

NIL

Note 1: Capital per unit of profit

80,000

4

52,000

3

48,000

3

= 20,000

= 17,333.33

= 16,000

Note 2: Capital per unit of profit

16,000

4

4,000

3

= 4,000

= 1,333.33

Statement of Piecemeal Distribution of Cash (Highest Relative Capital)

Date

Particulars

Cash

C Rs

P’s Cap.

R’s Cap.

M’s Cap.

2014

Rs

Rs

Rs

Rs

Rs

Mar. 31

Balances

6,000

74,000

80,000

52,000

48,000

Less: Minimum Balance

–4,000

Less: Paid Creditors

–2,000

–2,000

Balances

72,000

80,000

52,000

48,000

Apr. 30

Realisation (30,000 +

40,000 – 10,000)

60,000

Less: Paid Creditors

60,000

Balance

12,000

80,000

52,000

48,000

May 31

Realisation (20,000 + 48,000)

68,000

Add: Cash not required

+ 2,000

70,000

Less: Paid Creditors

–3,000

–3,000

Less: Paid P

–10,667

–10,667

Less: Paid P and R

–9,333

–5,333

–4,000

Less: Paid P, R and M

–47,000

–18,800

–14,100

–14,100

Balance

31,280

23,460

23,460

June 30

Realisation (36,000 + 60,000)

34,800

Less: Paid P, R and M

–34,800

–13,920

–10,440

–10,440

Balance

31,280

23,460

23,460

July 31 (Final)

Realisation (20,000 + 60,000)

80,000

Add: Cash not required

+ 2,000

82,000

Less: Paid P, R and M

–82,000

–32,800

–24,600

–24,600

Realisation Profit

1,520

1,140

1,140

Q15) From the balance sheet of M / s ideal store below, we share profit and loss in a ratio of 5: 3: 2 with Sunil, Anil and Neel as partners. The balance sheet on the dissolution date is as follows.

Liabilities

Amount (Rs)

Assets

Amount (Rs)

Partner’s Capital:

Fixed Assets

80,000

Sunil

38,800

Current Assets

60,000

Anil

20,400

Cash in hand

9,600

Neel

26,000

General Reserve

19,200

Sunil’s Loan

21,200

Sundry Creditors

24,000

1,49,600

1,49,600

(I) The realization cost was estimated at Rs 4,000.

(II) Assets have been realized as follows.

First installment Rs61,280

Second time Rs28,720

Third Rs21,000

(III) The actual realization cost was only Rs 3,000.

Create a statement showing the gradual distribution of cash by adopting the excess capital method.(12 marks)

A5)            In the books of M/S Ideal Store Statement of Excess Capital

Sunil (5)

Rs

Anil (3)

Rs

Neel (2)

Rs

Capitals

38,800

20,400

26,000

Add: General Reserve (5 : 3 : 2)

9,600

5,760

3,840

Adjusted Capitals

48,400

26,160

29,840

Considering Anil as base (Note 1)

43,600

26,160

17,440

Excess Capital

4,800

12,400

Considering Sunil as base (Note 2)

4,800

1,920

Ultimate Excess Capitals

10,480

Note 1: Capital per unit of profit

48,400

5

26,160

3

29,840

2

= 9,680

= 8,720

= 14,920

Note 2: Capital per unit of Profit

4,800

5

= 960

12, 400

2

= 6,200

First, pay Neel Rs 10,480.

Next, pay Sunil and Neel Rs 6,720 in 5 : 2. Balance pay to all in 5 : 3 : 2.

Statement of Piecemeal Distribution of Cash

Date

Particulars

Cash Available

Creditors

Sunil’ s

Loan

Sunil

Anil

Neel

Balance

9,600

24,000

21,200

48,400

21,160

29,840

Less: Kept aside for

4,000

Realisation expenses

Less: Paid creditors

5,600

5,600

Balances

18,400

21,200

48,400

26,160

29,840

1st

Realisation

61,280

Less: Paid Creditors

18,400

18,400

Less: Paid Loan

21,200

21,200

Less: Paid Neel

10,480

10,480

Less: Paid Sunil and

6,720

4,800

1,920

Neel in 5 : 2

Less: Paid all in 5 : 3 : 2

4,480

2,240

1,344

896

Balance

41,360

24,816

16,544

2nd

Realisation

28,720

Less: Paid all in 5 : 3 : 2

28,720

14,360

8,616

5,744

Balance

27,000

16,200

10,800

3rd and

Realisation

21,000

Final

Less: Paid all in 5 : 3 : 2

21,000

10,500

6,300

4,200

Realisation Loss

16,500

9,900

6,600

Q16) Maduri, Taboo and Juhi, who operate in partnership, have decided to dissolve after September 30, 2014. The date balance sheet is as follows:

Liabilities

Rs

Assets

Rs

Capital Accounts:

Fixed assets

40,000

Madhuri

20,000

Current Assets

22,000

Tabu

5,000

Bank

13,000

Juhi

     10,000

35,000

General Reserve

30,000

Creditors

10,000

75,000

75,000

Partner had the right to withdraw according to the arrangement with the bank.

Immediately 4,000, 9,000 after December 1, 2014. If the estimated realization cost is 1,000, the available funds must be distributed among the partners at the time of realization.

The following was realized:

Fixed Assets

Current Assets

31st October, 2014 (first)

10,000

5,000

15th November, 2014 (second)

26,000

12,000

30th December, 2014 (final)

10,000

12,000

The actual realization cost was 700 yen. You must submit a statement showing the distribution of cash between partners under the proportional capital method.(8 marks)

A6)

Particulars

Cash

Creditors

Madhuri

Tabu

Juhi

Balance due

Bank balance (available)

Less: Reserve for Expenses

– 4,000

1,000

10,000

30,000

15,000

20,000

Less: Paid to creditors Balance due

31-10 Realisation (10,000 + 5,000)

Less: Paid to creditors Balance

Less: Paid to Madhuri [I] Balance due

15-11 Realisation (26,000 + 1,200)

Less: Paid to Madhuri [I] Balance

Less: Paid to Madhuri & Juhi [II]

3,000

3,000

3,000

15,000

7,000

7,000

7,000

30,000

15,000

20,000

8,000

8,000

30,000

8,000

15,000

20,000

38,000

2,000

36,000

10,000

22,000

2,000

20,000

5,000

15,000

15,000

20,000

20,000

5,000

Balance due

Less: Paid to Madhuri, Tabu, & Juhi in PSR

26,000

26,000

15,000

8,666

15,000

8,667

15,000

8,667

Balance due

6,334

6,333

6,333

30-12 Realisation

Bank balance (available)

9,000

Add: Realisation (10,000 + 12,000)

22,000

Add: Unspent Expenses (10,00 – 700)

300

31,300

Less: Paid to Madhuri, Tabu & Juhi in PSR

31,300

10,434

10,433

10,433

Surplus paid

4,100

4,100

4,100

Q17) L, U, and M are in partnership, sharing profits and losses in proportions of 1/2, 1/3, and 1/6, respectively. Their company was dissolved on December 31, 2014, and on that date the company's balance sheet was as follows:

Balance sheet as at 31st December, 2014

Liabilities

Amount

Assets

Amount

Capitals

Cash

4,000

L

17,000

Debtors

42,000

U

8,000

Stock

16,000

M

1,000

General Reserve

6,000

Loans:

L

6,000

U

4,000

Creditors

20,000

62,000

62,000

It was agreed that the realizations should be distributed in the proper order at the end of each two weeks.

The realizations and costs were:

Particulars

Debtors

Stocks

Expenses

15th January 2014

7,500

4,500

1,000

31st January 2014

10,500

500

500

15th February 2014

8,500

8,500

1,000

28th February 2014

10,500

500

400

15th March 2014

2,050

3,050

600

The shares were completely turned off and the remaining debtors were to be taken over by M for the agreed amount of Rs 600.

Display the cash distribution statement according to the relative capital method.(8 marks)

A7)                      Statement of Distribution

Payment of Liabilities (including Partner’s Loan)

Date

Particulars

Cash

Creditors

Loan: L

Loan: U

2014

1-1

15-1

31-1

Balances

Less: Paid to creditors Balance due

Realisation (7,500 + 4,500 – 1,000)

Less: Paid to creditors Balance due

Realisation (10,500 + 500 – 500)

Less: Paid to creditors

Balance to Partners Loan (pro-data 6:4)

4,000

4,000

20,000

4,000

6,000

-

4,000

-

- 11,000

11,000

16,000

11,000

6,000

-

4,000

-

- 10,500

5,000

5,500

5,500

5,000

5,000

-

-

6,000

- 6,000

3,300

4,000

- 4,000

2,200

15-2

Realisation (8,500 + 8,500 – 1,000)

Less: Paid for loans

Balance c/d for payment of partners capitals

- 16,000

4,500

-

-

2,700

2,700

1,800

1,800

11,500

-

-

-

Payment of Partner’s Capital

Date

Particulars

Cash

L [3]

U [2]

M [1]

2014

1-1

Balances Due (capital + reserve)

-

20,000

10,000

2,000

Cash Balance b/d from A

11,500

Less: Paid to L (I)

5,000

5,000

-

-

15-2

Balance

6,500

15,000

10,000

2,000

Less: Paid to L & U (II)

6,500

3,900

2,600

-

Balances

-

11,100

7,400

2,000

28-2

Realisation (10,500 + 500 – 400)

10,600

Less: Paid to L & U (II) (15,000 – 6,500)

8,500

5,100

3,400

-

Balances

2,100

6,000

4,000

2,000

Less: Balances paid to all in profit sharing ratio

2,100

1,050

700

350

Balances due

-

4,950

3,300

1,650

15-3

Realisation (2,050 + 3,050 +

600 – 600)

5,100

Distributed to all in PSR

5,100

2,550

1,700

850

Unpaid Balances

-

2,400

1,600

800

Working note:

(1)                                            Profit Sharing Ratio (PSR) given in fraction (1/2, 1/3 and 1/6) when converted becomes 3 : 2 : 1.

(2)                                            Cash available at each stage is debtors + stock – expenses.

Debtors taken over by M at Rs 600 are added in cash realization and distribution on 15-3 Rs 850 distributed to M on 15-3 is made up of debtors Rs 600 and balance Rs 250 in cash.

Q18) A, B, and C have partnered to share 2: 1 gains and losses, respectively. The partnership was dissolved on March 31, 2014. The balance sheet for the same day is as follows.

Liabilities

Rs

Assets

Rs

Capital Accounts :

Cash in hand

28,000

A

1,40,000

Debtors

2,94,000

B

70,000

Stock

1,12,000

C

14,000

Creditors

2,10,000

-

4,34,000

4,34,000

A contingent liability was incurred under a discount for the $ 10,000 claim paid on August 25, 2014. At the end of each month, it was agreed that online realization should be distributed as safely and in the proper order as possible. The realizations and costs are as follows:

2014

Stock and Debtors Rs

Expenses

April

84,000

7,000

May

1,26,000

5,400

June

70,000

4,900

July

77,000

3,500

August

35,500

3,500

The shares were completely disposed of, the amount payable to the debtor was realized, and the balance was irreparable. The recipient of the discounted invoice met the invoice on time.

Make a statement showing the gradual distribution using the surplus capital method.(8 marks)

A8)                                        Statement  of Excess Capitals

A

B

C

Balance (Rs)

Profit Sharing Ratio (PSR)

Unit Value (Rs)

(Base Capital = 14,000) (BC)

Proportionate Capital (BC x PSR) (Rs)

Excess Capital (Rs)

Profit Sharing Ratio (PSR) (Rs)

Unit Value (Rs)

(Base Capital = 21,000) (BC)

Proportionate Capital (BC x PSR) (Rs)

Ultimate Excess Capital (Rs)

1,40,000

3

46,667

42,000

70,000

1

35,000

28,000

14,000

1

14,000

14,000

98,000

3

32,667

63,000

42,000

2

21,000

42,000

Nil

-

-

35,000

Nil

Payment Order:

  1. First pay to A : Rs 35,000.
  2. Next, pay A nad B 1,05,000 in 3 : 2 ratio.
  3. Then, balance t be paid to ABC in 3 : 2 : 1 ratio.

Statement of Piecemeal Distribution of Cash

Cash

Rs

Total

Claim Rs

Creditors

Rs

A

Rs

B

Rs

C

Rs

Balance Opening (-) Provision for

Contingent Liability

28,000

10,000

4,34,000

2,10,000

1,40,000

70,000

14,000

1st Realisation: April 2014

(-) Realisation Expenses

18,000

84,000

7,000

(-) Paid to Creditors Balance

2nd Realisation : May 2014

(-) Realisation Expenses

95,000

(95,000)

95,000

95,000

Nil 1,26,000

5,400

3,39,000

1,15,000

(-) Paid to Creditor

1,20,600

1,15,000

1,15,000

1,15,000

3rd Realisation : June 2014

(-) Realisation Expenses

5,600

70,700

4,900

2,24,000

Nil

(-) Paid to A

70,700

35,000

35,000

-

35,000

-

-

4th Realisation

(-) Realisation Expenses

35,700

77,000

3,500

1,89,000

-

1,05,000

70,000

14,000

1,09,200

(-) Paid to A and B (Excess Capital)

Balance

Final Realisation

(-) Realisation Expenses

1,05,000

1,05,000

-

63,000

42,000

-

4,200

35,500

3,500

84,000

-

42,000

28,000

14,000

(+) Provision on longer required

36,200

10,000

46,200

46,200

23,100

15,400

7,700

Loss on Realisation

-

37,800

18,900

12,600

6,300

Q19) A, B and C are partners who share profits and losses in a 4: 2 ratio. 1. The balance sheet is as follows, and the partnership will be dissolved on March 31, 2014.

Liabilities

Amount

Assets

Amount

Creditors

11,600

Cash in hand

340

General Reserve

18,900

Investment

30,000

Bank Overdraft

32,500

Stock

1,28,300

Capital:

Debtors

45,400

A

80,000

Machinery

32,600

B

1,60,000

Furniture

4,900

C

1,30,000

Building

1,91,460

4,33,000

4,33,000

All creditors are required to pay a realization cost of Rs 2,400. After that, all cash received should be distributed between the parties.

The amount was realized as follows.

1st Rs30,000. Second time Rs36,000. The 3rd Rs210,000. The 4th Rs92,000. The actual realization cost was 1200 yen.

Make a statement stating the distribution of cash under the excess capital method.(12 marks)

A9)                                     Statement of Excess Capitals

A

B

C

Capital

Add : General Reserve (PSR)

(A) Adjusted Capital

(B)  Profit sharing ratio (PSR0 Unit Value (A/B)

Proportionate Capital

(A’s Capital i.e. 22, 700 being minimum taken s Base Capital)

(C)  (Base Capital PSR) (3)

Excess Capital (A-C0 PSR

Unit Value

Proportionate Excess Capital Ultimate Excess Capital

80,000

10,800

1,60,000

5,400

1,30,000

2,700

90,800

4

22,700

90,800

1,65,400

2

82,700

45,400

1,32,700

1

1,32,700

22,700

Nil

-

(2)

1,20,000

2

60,000

1,20,000

1,10,000

1

1,10,000

60,000

-

Nil

(1) 50,000

Payment Schedule:

1. Pay 1st 50,000 to C.

2. Then 1,20,000 and 60,000 to B and C respectively.

3. Then to A, B and C in their PSR.

Statement showing distribution

Cash

Total

Bank

Creditors

A

B

C

Available

Claim Rs

O/D Rs

Rs

Rs

Rs

Rs

Balance

340

4,33,000

32,500

11,600

90,800

1,65,400

1,32,700

1st Realisation

30,000

Less: Provision for Realisation

Expenses

2,400

27,940

Less: Pid B. O/D and

Creditors Proportionately

27,940

27,940

20,590

7,350

Balance

-

4,05,060

11,910

4,250

2nd Realisation

36,000

Less: Paid BOD & Creditor

(16,160)

(16,160)

11,910

4,250

-

-

-

19,840

3,88,900

90,800

1,65,400

1,32,700

Balance

19,840

3,88,900

-

3rd Realisation

2,10,000

Paid to C

(50,000)

50,000

-

-

50,000

Balance

1,79,840

3,38,900

90,800

1,65,400

82,700

Less: Paid to B & C (PSR)

(1,79,840)

(1,79,840)

-

(1,19,893)

(59,947)

Balance

-

1,59,060

90,800

45,507

22,753

4th Realisation

92,000

Add to provision for Realisation

Expenses not required

1,200

93,200

Paid t All (in PSR)

93,200

93,200

53,166

26,690

13,344

Balance (Loss on Realisation)

-

656,860

37,634

18,817

9,409

Q20) X, Y, Z, which operates in partnership, decided to dissolve from 31st

December 2012. Below is the balance sheet for the day.

Liabilities

Amount

Assets

Amount

Capital Accounts:

Fixed Assets

80,000

X

40,000

Current Assets

40,000

Y

10,000

Bank

30,000

Z

20,000

70,000

Creditors

80,000

-

1,50,000

1,50,000

By arrangement with the bank, the partner is entitled to withdraw 10,000 each in January 2014, February 2014 and March 2014, and after securing an estimated realization cost of 2,000, when the available funds are realized. Partner.

The following was realized:

  1. January 2013 (first): Rs30,000.
  2. February 2013 (2nd time): Rs75,000
  3. March 2013 (final): Rs44,000
  4. The actual realization cost was 1,400 yen.

You will be asked to submit a statement indicating the distribution of cash (12 marks)

A10)

Statement of Excess  capitals

X ()

Y ()

Z ()

Capital Balance

40,000

10,000

20,000

P.S.R

1

1

1

Unit Value

(40,000)

(10,000)

(20,000)

Taking Y’s Capital as the base

10,000

10,000

10,000

Excess

30,000

Nil

10,000

PSR

1

-

-

Unit Value

(30,000)

-

(10,000)

Taking Z’s Capital as the basis

10,000

-

10,000

Ultimate Excess Capital

20,000

Nil

Nil

Statement of Piecemeal Distribution of Cash

Cash available

Total

Creditors

X

Y

Z

Balances

1st Realisation: (Jan. 2014)

Bank Balance Realised

10,000

30,000

1,50,000

80,000

40,000

10,000

20,000

Less: Prov. For Realisation Exp.

40,000

2,000

38,000

38,000

38,000

-

1,12,000

42,000

IInd Realisation (Feb. 2014)

Bank Balance Realised

10,000

75,000

Less: Paid Creditors

85,000

42,000

42,000

42,000

Less: Paid to X Less: Paid to X &

Z

Paid to XYZ equally

43,000

20,000

70,000

20,000

-

-

-

-

-

20,000

- 10,000

1,000

10,000

10,000

1,000

23,000

20,000

50,000

20,000

20,000

10,000

3,000

3,000

30,000

3,000

10,000

1,000

-

27,000

9,000

9,000

9,000

III rd. Realisation (Mar. 2014)

Bank Balance

10,000

Realized

44,000

54,000

Paid to XYZ

54,000

54,000

18,000

18,000

18,000

Profit on Realisation

-

27,000

9,000

9,000

9,000