Decision | true | true |
Reject | Type-1 error | Correct decision |
Do not reject | Correct decision | Type-2 error |
The null and alternative hypothesis will be- Also the alternative hypothesis left-tailed so that the test is left tailed test. Here, we want to test the hypothesis regarding population mean when population SD is unknown. So we should used t-test for if writing-life of pen follows normal distribution. But it is not the case. Since sample size is n = 100 (n > 30) large so we go for Z-test. The test statistic of Z-test is given by We get the critical value of left tailed Z test at 1% level of significance is Since calculated value of test statistic Z (= ‒2.8) is less than the critical value (= −2.33), that means calculated value of test statistic Z lies in rejection region so we reject the null hypothesis. Since the null hypothesis is the claim so we reject the manufacturer’s claim at 1% level of significance |
Boys | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
Marks I test | 23 | 20 | 19 | 21 | 18 | 20 | 18 | 17 | 23 | 16 | 19 |
Marks II test | 24 | 19 | 22 | 18 | 20 | 22 | 20 | 20 | 23 | 20 | 17 |
, nearly and df v=11-1=10 | ||||||
Students | ||||||
1 | 23 | 24 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
2 | 20 | 19 | -1 | -2 | 4 | |
3 | 19 | 22 | 3 | 2 | 4 | |
4 | 21 | 18 | -3 | -4 | 16 | |
5 | 18 | 20 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |
6 | 20 | 22 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |
7 | 18 | 20 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |
8 | 17 | 20 | 3 | 2 | 4 | |
9 | 23 | 23 | - | -1 | 1 | |
10 | 16 | 20 | 4 | 3 | 9 | |
11 | 19 | 17 | -2 | -3 | 9 | |
|
|
|
| |||
| Diet A |
|
| Diet B |
|
10 | -2 | 4 | 7 | -8 | 64 |
6 | -6 | 36 | 13 | -2 | 4 |
16 | 4 | 16 | 22 | 7 | 49 |
17 | 5 | 25 | 15 | 0 | 0 |
13 | 1 | 1 | 12 | -3 | 9 |
12 | 0 | 0 | 14 | -1 | 1 |
8 | -4 | 16 | 18 | 3 | 9 |
14 | 2 | 4 | 8 | -7 | 49 |
15 | 3 | 9 | 21 | 6 | 36 |
9 | -3 | 9 | 23 | 8 | 64 |
|
|
| 10 | -5 | 25 |
|
|
| 17 | 2 | 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
120 |
|
| 180 | 0 | 314 |
Assuming that the samples do not differ in weight so far as the two diets are concerned i.e. For v=20, we find =2.09 The calculated value of Hence the difference between the samples means is not significant i.e. thew two diets do not differ significantly as regards their effects on increase in weight. |
The critical (tabulated) values for two-tailed test at 5% level of significance are-
|
Number of heads | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
Frequency | 6 | 27 | 72 | 112 | 71 | 32 |
For v = 5, we have P, probability of getting a head=1/2;q, probability of getting a tail=1/2. Hence the theoretical frequencies of getting 0,1,2,3,4,5 heads are the successive terms of the binomial expansion Thus the theoretical frequencies are 10, 50, 100, 100, 50, 10. Hence, Since the calculated value of is much greater than the hypothesis that the data follow the binomial law is rejected. |
Round and yellow | Wrinkled and yellow | Round and green | Wrinkled and green | Total |
316 | 101 | 108 | 32 | 556 |
The corresponding frequencies are Hence, For v = 3, we have Since the calculated value of is much less than there is a very high degree of agreement between theory and experiment. |